Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] clk: tegra: Implement clocks for Tegra114

[Peter De Schrijver]

On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:08:55AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2013 03:48 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:

...

> > +       /* xusb_hs_src */
> > +       val = readl(clk_base + CLK_SOURCE_XUSB_SS_SRC);
> > +       val |= BIT(25); /* always select PLLU_60M */
> > +       writel(val, clk_base + CLK_SOURCE_XUSB_SS_SRC);
> > +
> > +       clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "xusb_hs_src", "pll_u_60M", 0,
> > +                                       1, 1);
> > +       clks[xusb_hs_src] = clk;
> > +
> 
> With device tree we can directly use pll_u_60M, no need to register 
> clock with fixed factor 1.
> Same comment for dis1-fixed, dsi2-fixed and mipi-cal-fast clocks.
> 

Does it make sense to have separate DT IDs at all then?

Cheers,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/