Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors

[Viresh Kumar]

On 4 February 2013 17:47, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, [1-2/4] are things I can take for v3.9 no problem.  The other two I'd
> wait for the next cycle to be honest.  We already have 30+ cpufreq patches
> scheduled for v3.9 and some of them quite subtle for that matter.

To be honest, i wanted to get these in 3.9 :) .
And that's why hurried on them and got this full series working in a single
day of work :)

Anyway, i understand your point and i also believe last two patches require some
testing/review before these getting in.

One important point i would like to highlight is:
governors directory would be present in cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/ now instead
of cpu/cpufreq/.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/