Re: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: add penalty for forcing a maintainerto edit a patch

[Anca Emanuel]

Joe, read lkml and decide after that.
I fully apove the pathch.

Reviewed-by: Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@xxxxxxxxx>

Review-requested-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Comments:
You have 3 kernels to maintain as stable, plus drivers, plus etc.
If somebody post something without reading the docs, and you have to
repeat to them the same, again and more, then you MUST give an beer.

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 16:43 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Maintainers have to hand-edit patches (body of patches and changelog
>> entries) all the time.  There needs to be some kind of penalty put into
>> place to keep developers from abusing maintainers.
>
> No, there doesn't.
>
> It's funny as a joke, it's not as an actual patch.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/