Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: Remove code redundancy between governors

[Viresh Kumar]

On 1 February 2013 04:21, Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:23:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This time I was *really* confused as to what patches I was supposed to take,
>> from whom and in what order, so I applied a number of them in the order given
>> by patchwork.  That worked well enough, because (almost) all of them applied
>> for me without conflicts.  That said I would appreciate it if you could look
>> into the bleeding-edge branch of my tree and see if there's anything missing
>> or something that shouldn't be there (cpufreq-wise).
>
> Sorry for the confusion, your current bleeding-edge branch (eed52da)
> looks good to me.  I also did a quick build and run and it works fine on
> my setup.

Really!! I see bleeding edge as df0e3f4 and i don't see the $(subject) patch
in it :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/