Re: [RFC][PATCH] rip out x86_32 NUMA remapping code

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 01/30/2013 04:56 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> This code was an optimization for 32-bit NUMA systems.
> 
> It has probably been the cause of a number of subtle bugs over
> the years, although the conditions to excite them would have
> been hard to trigger.  Essentially, we remap part of the kernel
> linear mapping area, and then sometimes part of that area gets
> freed back in to the bootmem allocator.  If those pages get
> used by kernel data structures (say mem_map[] or a dentry),
> there's no big deal.  But, if anyone ever tried to use the
> linear mapping for these pages _and_ cared about their physical
> address, bad things happen.
> 
> For instance, say you passed __GFP_ZERO to the page allocator
> and then happened to get handed one of these pages, it zero the
> remapped page, but it would make a pte to the _old_ page.
> There are probably a hundred other ways that it could screw
> with things.
> 
> We don't need to hang on to performance optimizations for
> these old boxes any more.  All my 32-bit NUMA systems are long
> dead and buried, and I probably had access to more than most
> people.
> 
> This code is causing real things to break today:
> 
> 	https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/9/376
> 
> I looked in to actually fixing this, but it requires surgery
> to way too much brittle code, as well as stuff like
> per_cpu_ptr_to_phys().
> 

I get a build failure on i386 allyesconfig with this patch:

arch/x86/power/built-in.o: In function `swsusp_arch_resume':
(.text+0x14e4): undefined reference to `resume_map_numa_kva'

It looks trivial to fix up; I assume resume_map_numa_kva() just goes
away like it does in the non-NUMA case, but it would be nice if you
could confirm that.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/