[PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: governors: Get rid of dbs_data->enable field

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Jan 31 2013 - 12:28:25 EST


CPUFREQ_GOV_START/STOP are called only once for all policy->cpus and hence we
don't need to adapt cpufreq_governor_dbs() routine for multiple calls.

So, this patch removes dbs_data->enable field entirely. And rearrange code a
bit.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Fabio,

I have fixed all the pending issues, but haven't checked these patches. Can you
please add your tested-by (obviously after testing them) ?

Compile tested only.

drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 58 +++++++++++++-------------------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 46f1c78..29d6a59 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
{
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *od_dbs_info = NULL;
struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *cs_dbs_info = NULL;
+ struct cs_ops *cs_ops = NULL;
+ struct od_ops *od_ops = NULL;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cpu_cdbs;
@@ -194,10 +196,12 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
cs_dbs_info = dbs_data->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
sampling_rate = &cs_tuners->sampling_rate;
ignore_nice = cs_tuners->ignore_nice;
+ cs_ops = dbs_data->gov_ops;
} else {
od_dbs_info = dbs_data->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
sampling_rate = &od_tuners->sampling_rate;
ignore_nice = od_tuners->ignore_nice;
+ od_ops = dbs_data->gov_ops;
}

switch (event) {
@@ -207,10 +211,9 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,

mutex_lock(&dbs_data->mutex);

- dbs_data->enable++;
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
- struct cpu_dbs_common_info *j_cdbs;
- j_cdbs = dbs_data->get_cpu_cdbs(j);
+ struct cpu_dbs_common_info *j_cdbs =
+ dbs_data->get_cpu_cdbs(j);

j_cdbs->cpu = j;
j_cdbs->cur_policy = policy;
@@ -225,13 +228,6 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
dbs_data->gov_dbs_timer);
}

- /*
- * Start the timerschedule work, when this governor is used for
- * first time
- */
- if (dbs_data->enable != 1)
- goto second_time;
-
rc = sysfs_create_group(cpufreq_global_kobject,
dbs_data->attr_group);
if (rc) {
@@ -249,17 +245,19 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
* governor, thus we are bound to jiffes/HZ
*/
if (dbs_data->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
- struct cs_ops *ops = dbs_data->gov_ops;
-
- cpufreq_register_notifier(ops->notifier_block,
+ cs_dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
+ cs_dbs_info->enable = 1;
+ cs_dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->cur;
+ cpufreq_register_notifier(cs_ops->notifier_block,
CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);

dbs_data->min_sampling_rate = MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO *
jiffies_to_usecs(10);
} else {
- struct od_ops *ops = dbs_data->gov_ops;
-
- od_tuners->io_is_busy = ops->io_busy();
+ od_dbs_info->rate_mult = 1;
+ od_dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
+ od_ops->powersave_bias_init_cpu(cpu);
+ od_tuners->io_is_busy = od_ops->io_busy();
}

/* Bring kernel and HW constraints together */
@@ -267,18 +265,6 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
MIN_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER * latency);
*sampling_rate = max(dbs_data->min_sampling_rate, latency *
LATENCY_MULTIPLIER);
-
-second_time:
- if (dbs_data->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
- cs_dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
- cs_dbs_info->enable = 1;
- cs_dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->cur;
- } else {
- struct od_ops *ops = dbs_data->gov_ops;
- od_dbs_info->rate_mult = 1;
- od_dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
- ops->powersave_bias_init_cpu(cpu);
- }
mutex_unlock(&dbs_data->mutex);

/* Initiate timer time stamp */
@@ -297,16 +283,12 @@ second_time:

mutex_lock(&dbs_data->mutex);
mutex_destroy(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex);
- dbs_data->enable--;
- if (!dbs_data->enable) {
- struct cs_ops *ops = dbs_data->gov_ops;
-
- sysfs_remove_group(cpufreq_global_kobject,
- dbs_data->attr_group);
- if (dbs_data->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE)
- cpufreq_unregister_notifier(ops->notifier_block,
- CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
- }
+
+ sysfs_remove_group(cpufreq_global_kobject,
+ dbs_data->attr_group);
+ if (dbs_data->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE)
+ cpufreq_unregister_notifier(cs_ops->notifier_block,
+ CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
mutex_unlock(&dbs_data->mutex);

break;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
index b72e628..c19a16c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ struct dbs_data {
#define GOV_CONSERVATIVE 1
int governor;
unsigned int min_sampling_rate;
- unsigned int enable; /* number of CPUs using this policy */
struct attribute_group *attr_group;
void *tuners;

--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/