Re: [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps

From: paul . szabo
Date: Wed Jan 30 2013 - 14:49:01 EST


Dear Pavel and Dave,

> The assertion was that 4GB with no PAE passed a forkbomb test (ooming)
> while 4GB of RAM with PAE hung, thus _PAE_ is broken.

Yes, PAE is broken. Still, maybe the above needs slight correction:
non-PAE HIGHMEM4G passed the "sleep test": no OOM, nothing unexpected;
whereas PAE OOMed then hung (tested with various RAM from 3GB to 64GB).

The feeling I get is that amd64 is proposed as a drop-in replacement for
PAE, that support and development of PAE is gone, that PAE is dead.

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo psz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/