Re: [PATCH 6/11] ksm: remove old stable nodes more thoroughly

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +static int remove_all_stable_nodes(void)
> +{
> +	struct stable_node *stable_node;
> +	int nid;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	for (nid = 0; nid < nr_node_ids; nid++) {
> +		while (root_stable_tree[nid].rb_node) {
> +			stable_node = rb_entry(root_stable_tree[nid].rb_node,
> +						struct stable_node, node);
> +			if (remove_stable_node(stable_node)) {
> +				err = -EBUSY;

It's a bit rude to overwrite remove_stable_node()'s return value.

> +				break;	/* proceed to next nid */
> +			}
> +			cond_resched();

Why is this here?

> +		}
> +	}
> +	return err;
> +}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/