[PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/2] rcu: Allow TREE_PREEMPT_RCU on UP systems

[Paul E. McKenney]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The TINY_PREEMPT_RCU is complex, does not provide that much memory
savings, and therefore TREE_PREEMPT_RCU should be used instead.  The
systems where the difference between TINY_PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
are quite small compared to the memory footprint of CONFIG_PREEMPT.

This commit therefore takes a first step towards eliminating
TINY_PREEMPT_RCU by allowing TREE_PREEMPT_RCU to be configured on !SMP
systems.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 init/Kconfig |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index a5e90e1..fb19b46 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ config TREE_RCU
 
 config TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
 	bool "Preemptible tree-based hierarchical RCU"
-	depends on PREEMPT && SMP
+	depends on PREEMPT
 	help
 	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is
 	  designed for very large SMP systems with hundreds or
@@ -461,6 +461,8 @@ config TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
 	  is also required.  It also scales down nicely to
 	  smaller systems.
 
+	  Select this option if you are unsure.
+
 config TINY_RCU
 	bool "UP-only small-memory-footprint RCU"
 	depends on !PREEMPT && !SMP
-- 
1.7.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/