Re: [PATCH] IRQ CORE: irq_work_queue function return value not used.

[Frederic Weisbecker]

2012/11/3 anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>:
> From: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
> it is better to just make it void.
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/irq_work.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> index 1588e3b..4829a31 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> @@ -79,17 +79,16 @@ static void __irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
>   *
>   * Can be re-enqueued while the callback is still in progress.
>   */
> -bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
> +void irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)

Please also update the headers in include/linux/irq_work.h accordingly.

Thanks.

>  {
>         if (!irq_work_claim(work)) {
>                 /*
>                  * Already enqueued, can't do!
>                  */
> -               return false;
> +               return;
>         }
>
>         __irq_work_queue(work);
> -       return true;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_queue);
>
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/