Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

[H. Peter Anvin]

Yes.

Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3
>either
>> >> in my inbox nor on LKML...
>> > 
>> > I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even
>> > got a delivery confirmation from yours on patch 3 (other than
>> > e.g. from Ingo's, and all of this identical to 0...2).
>> > 
>> > Or see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1688991/, according
>> > to which you even responded to it (which is the concern Ingo was
>> > referring to).
>> > 
>> 
>> Ah yes, now I have the context.
>> 
>> And with that, I have to NAK the patch.  I did talk to the KVM 
>> people and they confirmed that this is NOT something they 
>> want.  They do not program VT-x to VMEXIT on CR0 changes.
>> 
>> So this is Xen-specific, and penalizing other hypervisors is 
>> wrong.
>
>Are patches #1 and #2 still OK?
>
>Thanks,
>
>	Ingo

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/