Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair()

[Michael Wang]

On 01/24/2013 06:34 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 17:26 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: 
>> On 01/24/2013 05:07 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:14 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now it's time to work on v3 I think, let's see what we could get this time.
>>>
>>> Maybe v3 can try to not waste so much ram on affine map?
>>
>> Yeah, that has been a question in my mind at very beginning, but how...
> 
> Allocate at domain build time the max we can acquire via hotplug?
>>> Even better would be if it could just go away, along with relic of the
>>> bad old days wake_affine(), and we make the balance path so damn light
>>> but clever that select_idle_sibling() can go away too... and a pony ;-)
>>
>> Hmm...may be, I need some consideration here, a totally balance path,
>> interesting...
> 
> Unification is the right target, hitting it might not be so easy though.
> 
>> But I think we still need the clean code which sbm bring to us, do we?
> 
> Sure, if it makes things perform better.

Ok, let me think about these, big changes may not show in v3, but I will
keep those in mind.

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> -Mike
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/