Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] cgroup: remove bogus comments in cgroup_diput()

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Li.

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:32:02PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Since commit 48ddbe194623ae089cc0576e60363f2d2e85662a
> ("cgroup: make css->refcnt clearing on cgroup removal optional"),
> each css holds a ref on cgroup's dentry, so cgroup_diput() won't be
> called until all css' refs go down to 0, which invalids the comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index f18b0d9..368cff1 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -899,12 +899,6 @@ static void cgroup_diput(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
>  		struct cgroup *cgrp = dentry->d_fsdata;
>  
>  		BUG_ON(!(cgroup_is_removed(cgrp)));
> -		/* It's possible for external users to be holding css
> -		 * reference counts on a cgroup; css_put() needs to
> -		 * be able to access the cgroup after decrementing
> -		 * the reference count in order to know if it needs to
> -		 * queue the cgroup to be handled by the release
> -		 * agent */

The latter half is still true tho.  I applied the patch anyway as the
comment isn't all that useful without covering everything intended to
be covered with RCU.  Can you please write up another patch
documenting what's covered by RCU (stuff that we intend to keep
guaranteeing to be safe to access only w/ RCU)?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/