Re: Doubts about listen backlog and tcp_max_syn_backlog

[Leandro Lucarella]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:28:08AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> >Then if syncookies are enabled, the time spent in connect() shouldn't be
> >bigger than 3 seconds even if SYNs are being "dropped" by listen, right?
> 
> Do you mean if "ESTABLISHED" connections are dropped because the
> listen queue is full?  I don't think I would put that as "SYNs being
> dropped by listen" - too easy to confuse that with an actual
> dropping of a SYN segment.

I was just kind of quoting the name given by netstat: "SYNs to LISTEN
sockets dropped" (for kernel 3.0, I noticed newer kernels don't have
this stat anymore, or the name was changed). I still don't know if we
are talking about the same thing.

> But yes, I would not expect a connect() call to remain incomplete
> for any longer than it took to receive an SYN|ACK from the other
> end.

So the only reason to experience these high times spent in connect()
should be because a SYN or SYN|ACK was actually loss in a lower layer,
like an error in the network device or a transmission error?

> That would be 3 (,9, 21, etc...) seconds on a kernel with 3
> seconds as the initial retransmission timeout.

Which can't be changed without recompiling, right?

Thanks!

-- 
Leandro Lucarella
sociomantic labs GmbH
http://www.sociomantic.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/