Re: [patch v1 2/5] regulator: da9055 change irq state to default

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:05:12PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:

> > What makes you say that there is a dependency here?  It's really not at
> > all obvious why a change to the primary IRQ signalling mechanism would
> > affect the internal interrupts of the device.

> Yes, functionally this dependency should not matter.However, if
> mfd/primary irq state is low and its components are high then it shall
> not look good. Therefore the term dependency was used, probably I should
> have written it in a different manner.

This logic doesn't follow terribly directly - looking at what you've
posted it in fact seems that the trigger type is irrelevant in the
function drivers?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature