Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port

[James Hogan]

On 19/01/13 05:55, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +0000, James Hogan wrote:
>> Hi Stephen, Al,
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
>>>> of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and
>>>> GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal).
>>>
>>> OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to Al.
>>
>> I'm still rebasing the metag tree, and it's not quite ready for -next so
>> I don't mind if Al's tree rebases at this stage tbh.
>>
>> Al: I don't know if you normally rebase your tree, but if it's okay with
>> you I'll let you know when I need it not to be rebased.
> 
> Umm...  
> 	1) #master is definitely bad for base; #for-linus is much safer (and
> sufficient for your case)

Thanks for that, and I see it's now merged into Linus' tree so I'll
rebase onto that instead.

Cheers
James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/