Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] spi/pxa2xx: add support for DMA engine

[Mika Westerberg]

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:44:36PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:31:59AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > +bool dma_is_possible(size_t len)
> > +int map_dma_buffers(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> > +irqreturn_t dma_transfer(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> > +int dma_prepare(struct driver_data *drv_data, u32 dma_burst)
> > +void dma_start(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> > +int dma_setup(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> > +void dma_release(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> > +void dma_resume(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> > +int set_dma_burst_and_threshold(struct chip_data *chip,
> > +				struct spi_device *spi,
> > +				u8 bits_per_word, u32 *burst_code,
> > +				u32 *threshold)
> 
> All the above function names end up in the global namespace in the kernel
> image.  They're rather _too_ generic and non-specific for them to leak to
> that visibility.  I think this needs fixing.

Indeed, good point. I will fix this.

> Also, I'd suggest that the long term plan is for PXA to move over to the
> DMA engine API, so I'd recommend that the pxa2xx SPI driver have the
> DMA engine API usage built into it, and let's treat the old PXA DMA
> stuff as legacy code.

In the previous version I had the old PXA DMA stuff behind #ifdef
CONFIG_ARCH_PXA and otherwise it used the DMA engine stuff. Do you mean
something like that (e.g keep both DMA in the single file)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/