Which Linux did you test? pvops or something based on the classic-Xen
patches?
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 11:55 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:Agreed on all counts.What's this? pr_fmt() alone makes no sense at all, and I'd be+static void notify_front_arping(struct xenbus_device *dev)On 21.01.13 at 08:26, jianhai luan <jianhai.luan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+{
+ int err;
+
+ if (dev->state != XenbusStateConnected)
+ return;
+
+ err = xenbus_printf(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename, "state", "%d", dev->state);
+ if (err) {
+ pr_fmt("Error writing the state");
pretty surprised if the compiler didn't warn about this construct.
Further, you probably want to say "re-writing" and include the
error code in the message. And of course you want a \n at the
end.
Finally - no need for the braces ...
+ }... nor this "return".
+
+ return;
Jason, when you resend with these fixes please CC the netdev list and
folks listed by ./scripts/get-maintainers.pl for the patch.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel