Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair()

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Mon Jan 21 2013 - 03:26:22 EST


On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 15:34 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 02:42 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 13:07 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> >
> >> That seems like the default one, could you please show me the numbers in
> >> your datapoint file?
> >
> > Yup, I do not touch the workfile. Datapoints is what you see in the
> > tabulated result...
> >
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 5
> > 5
> > 5
> > 10
> > 10
> > 10
> > ...
> >
> > so it does three consecutive runs at each load level. I quiesce the
> > box, set governor to performance, echo 250 32000 32 4096
> >> /proc/sys/kernel/sem, then ./multitask -nl -f, and point it
> > at ./datapoints.
>
> I have changed the "/proc/sys/kernel/sem" to:
>
> 2000 2048000 256 1024
>
> and run few rounds, seems like I can't reproduce this issue on my 12 cpu
> X86 server:
>
> prev post
> Tasks jobs/min jobs/min
> 1 508.39 506.69
> 5 2792.63 2792.63
> 10 5454.55 5449.64
> 20 10262.49 10271.19
> 40 18089.55 18184.55
> 80 28995.22 28960.57
> 160 41365.19 41613.73
> 320 53099.67 52767.35
> 640 61308.88 61483.83
> 1280 66707.95 66484.96
> 2560 69736.58 69350.02
>
> Almost nothing changed...I would like to find another machine and do the
> test again later.

Hm. Those numbers look odd. Ok, I've got 8 more cores, but your hefty
load throughput is low. When I look low end numbers, seems your cores
are more macho than my 2.27 GHz EX cores, so it should have been a lot
closer. Oh wait, you said "12 cpu".. so 1 6 core package + HT? This
box is 2 NUMA nodes (was 4), 2 (was 4) 10 core packages + HT.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/