Re: [PATCH 0/6] acpi-cpufreq and powernow-k8 fixes

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, January 21, 2013 01:04:02 AM Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:18:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, it all looks reasonable to me.
> >
> > I suppose you'd like it to go into v3.8 plus v3.7-stable, right?
> 
> Well, sort of.
> 
> Patch 0001 which you've already taken and tagged for 3.7-stable and is
> on its way to 3.8 is fine since it fixes a bug.
> 
> The rest are, IMHO, more or less annoyances fixes which could easily
> wait for 3.9 and maybe be backported if there really is an issue. Also,
> they'd see a lot more testing this way. Because in at least 99% of the
> cases, acpi-cpufreq and powernow-k8 are modules and the handoff works
> there.
> 
> This is at least how I see it, you tell me whether it makes sense or
> not.

Yes, it does.

I will take [2-6/6] for v3.9, then, if there are no objections.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/