Re: [PULL] kms locking rework

[Sedat Dilek]

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I am testing your patchset (original postings at [1]).
>> At a 1st look it seems to be OK.
>> Any tests you want me to run?
>
> Imo the fundamentals of the series are well-tested with the i-g-t
> series, so running things on as many (non-i915) gpus as possible is
> the most interesting thing. I just don't have that many radeon/nouveau
> machines lying around for that ...
>

I am here on SNB, so.

> If you want to get really fancy, set up a zaphod dual-head config with
> 2 independent X servers to check whether concurrent pageflips don't
> cause havoc. That needs something which pageflips, ofc.

Sounds like a lot of work...
Any docs/wiki around to manage such a setup?

- Sedat -

> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/