Re: LIO - the broken iSCSI target implementation

[promo]

Please don't start another "SCST Vs. LIO" holy war here. We all know why LIO belongs to Linux kernel and SCST does not.

On Friday, January 18, 2013 3:54:18 AM UTC+2, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> Andreas Steinmetz, on 01/16/2013 08:19 PM wrote:
> 
> > Thus, lio (http://www.linux-iscsi.org/) seemed to be the politically and
> 
> > technically favoured solution.
> 
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> 
> > The fun part of it was that I finally ended up using SCST - which was
> 
> > refrained from kernel inclusion for technical reasons beyond my
> 
> > knowledge.
> 
> 
> 
> No, it was purely political. There has never been any technical argument why LIO 
> 
> is better. And can not be.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vlad
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> 
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/