Re: [PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: Warn user when powernow-k8 tries tofall back to acpi-cpufreq and it is unavailable.

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:07:55PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Just flip the link order? It's only the way it is because in the
> > past we wanted to try hardware-specific drivers before more generic
> > ones, and I don't think that's a concern in this case now.
>
> Yeah, I heard that the acpi-idle and intel-idle drivers do that and also
> heard that it was a hack. It doesn't look too ugly IMHO:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=2671717265ae6e720a9ba5f13fbec3a718983b65

Haha, this turns into one of those chicken-or-the-egg problems:

>From <drivers/cpufreq/Makefile>:

##################################################################################
# x86 drivers.
# Link order matters. K8 is preferred to ACPI because of firmware bugs in early
# K8 systems.
...

Great. :(

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/