Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Fold acpi_bus_scan() into acpi_bus_add()

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Fri Jan 18 2013 - 12:47:08 EST


On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() into acpi_bus_add() is
> the invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact
> is unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been
> called by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented causes the
> next invocations of it to do nothing.
>
> For this reason, drop the acpi_update_all_gpes() call from
> acpi_bus_add() and fold acpi_bus_scan() into it. Additionally,
> rename acpi_bus_scan_fixed() to acpi_bus_add_fixed(), because
> acpi_bus_scan() is not present any more, and rearrange the code
> in acpi_scan_init() slightly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1584,24 +1584,6 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac
> return status;
> }
>
> -static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle)
> -{
> - void *device = NULL;
> -
> - if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_check_add(handle, 0, NULL, &device)))
> - acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> - acpi_bus_check_add, NULL, NULL, &device);
> -
> - if (!device)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_device_attach(handle, 0, NULL, NULL)))
> - acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> - acpi_bus_device_attach, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * acpi_bus_add - Add ACPI device node objects in a given namespace scope.
> * @handle: Root of the namespace scope to scan.
> @@ -1616,13 +1598,19 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle han
> */
> int acpi_bus_add(acpi_handle handle)

looks like scan is good name.

scan = add + attach better than
add = add + attach?

> {
> - int err;
> + void *device = NULL;
> +
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_check_add(handle, 0, NULL, &device)))
> + acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> + acpi_bus_check_add, NULL, NULL, &device);
> +
> + if (!device)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> - err = acpi_bus_scan(handle);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_device_attach(handle, 0, NULL, NULL)))
> + acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> + acpi_bus_device_attach, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>
> - acpi_update_all_gpes();
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_add);
> @@ -1670,7 +1658,7 @@ int acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *st
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_bus_trim);
>
> -static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
> +static int acpi_bus_add_fixed(void)
> {
> int result = 0;
> struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
> @@ -1709,18 +1697,20 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> /*
> * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
> */
> - result = acpi_bus_scan(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT);
> + result = acpi_bus_add(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT);
> if (result)
> return result;
>
> result = acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, &acpi_root);
> - if (!result)
> - result = acpi_bus_scan_fixed();
> -
> if (result)
> + return result;
> +
> + result = acpi_bus_add_fixed();
> + if (result) {
> acpi_device_unregister(acpi_root);
> - else
> - acpi_update_all_gpes();
> + return result;
> + }
>
> - return result;
> + acpi_update_all_gpes();
> + return 0;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/