But that's something each guest has to decide for itself.On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:22:49PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:On 17.01.13 at 13:22, Matt Wilson<msw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:We have the framework to use v2, but there are no backends thatI think it would be better if the dom0/service domain and hypervisor
actually use it. The end result is that on PV we use v2 grants
and on PVHVM v1. The v1 has a capacity of 512 grants per page while
the v2 has 256 grants per page. This means we lose about 50%
capacity - and if we want more than 16 VIFs (each VIF takes
512 grants), then we are hitting the max per guest of 32.
Note: The hypervisor provides an over-ride for the default
of 32 frames (pages) per guest: gnttab_max_nr_frames=X
prevent the guest from setting the version to 2 if the backend isn't
going to make use of them. In the short term, we could add a Xen
option to limit the supported version to 1.
Anyway - if no-one's using v2, what did it get introduced for
(not only in the hypervisor, but also in the kernel)? I thought
the networking drivers were intended to make use of it...
Jan--