Re: [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf: Verify signature of signed elf binary

[Mimi Zohar]

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 13:57 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:45:12PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> 
> [..]
> > > Given the fact that signatures are stored in extended attributes, to me
> > > the only way to sign executables in current IMA framework would to be
> > > prepare file system image at build server and ship that image. And
> > > then installer simply mounts that image (after making sure that proper
> > > verification keys have been loaded in kernel).
> > 
> > That is one scenario.  Another scenario is to update packages to include
> > extended attributes and to write those extended attributes on
> > installation.
> 
> Ok, that's the point I am missing. So I can sign a file and signatures
> are in a separate file. And these signatures are installed in extended
> attributes at file installation time (IOW rpm installation time) on
> target.
> 
> If all this works, this sounds reasonable so far. Except the point of
> disabling ptrace and locking down memory. 
> 
> So what's the state of above work. Is there something I can play with.

Sorry, I'm not sure of the RPM implementation details of where/how the
signatures are stored in the package, nor of the status of these
changes.  Perhaps someone else on the mailing list knows.

thanks,

Mimi



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/