[ 160/171] rbd: BUG on invalid layout

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Jan 15 2013 - 17:53:26 EST


3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx>

This shouldn't actually be possible because the layout struct is
constructed from the RBD header and validated then.

[elder@xxxxxxxxxxx: converted BUG() call to equivalent rbd_assert()]

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
(based on commit 6cae3717cddaf8e5e96e304733dca66e40d56f89)
---
drivers/block/rbd.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -930,8 +930,9 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request
layout->fl_object_size = cpu_to_le32(1 << RBD_MAX_OBJ_ORDER);
layout->fl_pg_preferred = cpu_to_le32(-1);
layout->fl_pg_pool = cpu_to_le32(dev->poolid);
- ceph_calc_raw_layout(osdc, layout, snapid, ofs, &len, &bno,
- req, ops);
+ ret = ceph_calc_raw_layout(osdc, layout, snapid, ofs, &len, &bno,
+ req, ops);
+ BUG_ON(ret != 0);

ceph_osdc_build_request(req, ofs, &len,
ops,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/