Re: [PATCH] module, fix percpu reserved memory exhaustion

[Prarit Bhargava]

On 01/11/2013 08:06 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On 01/10/2013 10:48 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> The timing were similar.  I didn't see any huge delays, etc.  Can the
>> relocations really cause a long delay?  I thought we were pretty much writing
>> values to memory...
> 
> For x86 that's true, but look at what ppc64 has to do for example.  I'm
> guessing you don't have a giant Nvidia proprietary driver module
> loading, either.

Ah -- I see.  I hadn't thought much about the other arches and I see what ppc64
does ...

> 
>> [I should point out that I'm booting a 32 physical/64 logical, with 64GB of memory]
> 
> I figured it had to be something big ;)

:)  Imagine what happens at 4096 cpus (SGI territory).  I'm wondering about that
kvm commit.  Maybe the systemd/udev rule needs to be rewritten to avoid a 'kvm
loading flood' during boot ... I'll talk with Kay Sievers about it to see if
there's a way around that.

> 
> OTOH, Tested-by: means it actually fixed someone's problem.

Got it.  For the record over-the-weekend testing didn't show any bizarre
results.  The boot times were all around 20-23 seconds.

Tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>

P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/