Re: [PATCH 0/5] Cpufreq Fixes for 3.9

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:44:37 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> As requested, i am resending all my cpufreq fixes together. I have added correct
> Tested-by flags.

I have dropped the previous versions and applied this series instead.

There's no need to add a Tested-by for yourself if you sign-off a patch,
though.  Tested-by is information that somebody *in* *addition* to the
original author has tested the patch, because we all should test the patches
we sign-off, right?

Rafael


> Viresh Kumar (5):
>   cpufreq: Manage only online cpus
>   cpufreq: Notify governors when cpus are hot-[un]plugged
>   cpufreq: Don't use cpu removed during cpufreq_driver_unregister
>   cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()
>   cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c       | 316 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c |  27 +++-
>  drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c    |   9 ++
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h         |  14 +-
>  4 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
> 
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/