Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] DMA Engine support for AM33XX

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 11 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote:
> We have tightly coupled the link-time dependency for
> omap_dma_filter_fn by going down the path of using
> dma_request_slave_channel_compat() as Tony suggested to avoid extra
> ifdefry.
> 
> That dependency will go away naturally if all the "legacy" OMAP platforms
> were required to only boot from DT...just as a newly added SoCs are.
> 
> Are you suggesting unwinding the _compat() approach?

No, I was thinking we could define omap_dma_filter_fn to NULL
for the DT-only case.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/