Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Jan 11 2013 - 11:05:16 EST


On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:37:17PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 09:27 -0600, Brian King wrote:
> > It looks like this was a due to the fact that the new patches
> > added __devinit tags in the same merge window the __devinit tag
> > itself was getting removed.
>
> Not exactly. The patch which makes them nops went into 3.8. Now
> there's a patch queued in, Gregs tree I presume, to remove them all and
> the #defines which causes the compile failure.
>
> > As to the sparse warnings, this patch fixed the ones that
> > were actual bugs in the new code, although we could have
> > made that more clear in the patch description.
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=135716576204083&w=2
>
> Ah, thanks ... I've been on holiday for a while, so I did miss that.
>
> > There is one outstanding issue I am aware of which was an
> > array bounds compiler warning which looks to be a misdetection
> > by the compiler. Wendy and I discussed adding a BUG_ON
> > to stop the compiler from complaining.
> >
> > Wendy - lets queue these two changes up ASAP. They should both
> > be very simple changes.
>
> If it's a simple gcc bug, just ignore it.
>
> I do need you to redo the patches to remove the __dev annotations,
> though. We can't risk introducing a bisect killing compile breakage if
> Greg's tree merges before mine in the next merge window.

This change should be pushed to Linus in time for 3.8-final, so there
should not be any bisect issues.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/