Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi James,

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 +0000 James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
> > can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or some
> > other tree that does not rebase).  Its OK to test by doing a merge with
> > linux-next ...
> 
> Thanks for the info Stephen. So I suppose if the patchset depended on
> things in -next the normal way to do it would be to merge in the
> individual trees I needed first?

Yep, but please let the maintainers of those trees know that you expect
their tree to not be rebased.  Or, if if they aren't really dependencies
just conflicts, then leave the other tree out and let me and Linus fix
the conflicts when we merge your tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature