Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10 January 2013 13:24, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:50:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> @Shawn: I believe your driver don't require that ugly code anymore (Though i
>> know there is a situation for that to happen, if we have two cpus, you remove
>> second one and then add it back. With this cpufreq_add_dev() would call init()
>> first and then try to match if there are any managed_policies present. But the
>> issue you pointed out about unregistering the driver would be solved by this
>> patch.)
>
> Yes, just played it and it works for me.  However, I would have to keep
> that little ugly code in my patch to save the dependency on your patch.
> Will send a follow-up to clean that up once your patch hits mainline.

Another thing, can i have a tested-by from you for both my patches ? remove and
add dev?

That would help it go quicker.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/