Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()

[Viresh Kumar]

On 9 January 2013 21:09, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 9 January 2013 16:50, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> [Probably need to simplify cpufreq_add_dev() too, but that can be done as next
>> step.]
>
> I have tried that too, it is also pushed at:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/16/5
>
> [Untested for now, will be doing it tomorrow]
>
> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:02:50 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
>
> Currently cpufreq_add_dev() firsts allocated policy, calls ->init() and then
> checks if this cpu should be already managed or not. And if it already managed,
> free its policy.
>
> We can save all this if we somehow know if this cpu is managed or not in
> advance. policy->related_cpus contains list of all valid sibling cpus of
> policy->cpu. We can check this to know if current cpu is already managed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/