Re: [RFC PATCH v1 25/31] ARC: [plat-arcfpga] Hooking up platformto ARC UART
From: Vineet Gupta
Date: Mon Jan 07 2013 - 08:10:45 EST
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 07:46 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2012, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> +static struct platform_device arc_uart##n##_dev = { \
>> + .name = "arc-uart", \
>> + .id = n, \
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(arc_uart##n##_res), \
>> + .resource = arc_uart##n##_res, \
>> + .dev = { \
>> + .platform_data = &arc_uart_info, \
>> + }, \
>> +}
>> +
>> +ARC_UART_DEV(0);
>> +#if CONFIG_SERIAL_ARC_NR_PORTS > 1
>> +ARC_UART_DEV(1);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static struct platform_device *fpga_early_devs[] __initdata = {
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_ARC_CONSOLE)
>> + &arc_uart0_dev,
>> +#endif
>> +};
>
> statically defining platform devices like this is considered very
> bad style, especially since it prevents you from doing proper
> boot-time configuration. Please get the available devices from
> the boot loader. Normally this is done using a flattened device
> tree blob that gets passed, unless you can probe the hardware
> directly.
>
> Arnd
>
I have a first pass at device tree implementation: extracting plat-clk and
sdram-size as runtime values was relatively easy. However adding arc-uart device
is turning out to be non-trivial and I'm hitting a bunch of blockers which I hope
you and/or Grant will help me with. Please rest assured that I'm only seeking help
after enough grepping and debuggign this for whole day (with -DDEBUG) in much of
device model code.
I used following as refs:
[1] http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage
[2] Documentation/devicetrre/usage_model.txt
[3] metag's implementation which helped to some extent.
[4] drivers/tty/serial/arc_uart.c (merged in 3.8)
[5] lots and lots of grep in arch/*
I have a very minimal device tree file for Angel4 board with just arc-uart device.
---------------------->8--------------------------------
/ {
compatible = "snps,angel4";
clock-frequency = <80000000>; /* 80 MHZ */
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
chosen {
bootargs = "console=ttyARC0,115200n8";
};
cpus {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
cpu@0 {
device_type = "cpu";
compatible = "snps,arc770d";
reg = <0>;
};
};
memory {
device_type = "memory";
reg = <0x00000000 0x20000000>; /* 512M */
};
fpga {
compatible = "simple-bus";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges;
serial@c0fc1000 {
compatible = "snps,arc-uart";
reg = <0xc0fc1000 0x100>;
interrupts = <5>;
status = "okay";
};
};
};
---------------------->8--------------------------------
(1) Although I don't need the container "fpga" I'm forced to - because
of_platform_populate( ) -> of_match_node( ) expects the @match arg to be NOT NULL.
So we pass of_default_bus_match_table and have the compat string "simple-bus" in
the container. Per [1] it seemed it was possible to add the serial device directly
w/o the container.
(2) I need the following OF_DEV_AUXDATA to be able to "name" the device correctly
so that the registered driver [4] can bind with device. How do I match the driver
and devicetree node w/o this glue - it seems compatible="<manuf>,<model>" is not
enough. This also requires the uart base address to be specified (otherwise
of_dev_lookup() fails to identify the auxdata) which IMHO defeats the purpose of
devicetree in first place.
static struct of_dev_auxdata arcuart_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
OF_DEV_AUXDATA("snps,arc-uart", UART0_BASE, "arc-uart", arc_uart_info),
{}
};
(3) After above, driver's probe routine is getting called with platform_device->id
= -1 and it seems of_device_add() is doing that purposely. How do I handle that.
(4) Is above standalone "interrupts" string OK, or do I have to explicitly
instantiate the in-core intc as well. Since it is integral part of cpu, I really
don't need any support code to explicitly instantiate it. Also it is not accessed
via mem map - but special ARC instructions in aux address space of cpu.
TIA,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/