Re: Fix test relying in wrong behavior of is_printable

[Jon Loeliger]

> Hi David
> 
> =CE=91=CF=80=CF=8C =CF=84=CE=BF iPhone =CE=BC=CE=BF=CF=85
> 
> 6 =CE=99=CE=B1=CE=BD 2013, 5:58, =CE=BF/=CE=B7 David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxx=
> opbear.id.au> =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:16:08PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> After fixing the is_printable bug the test suite fails.
> >> Fix it with this patch
> >>=20
> >> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >=20
> > Rather than just removing the test, it would be better to still run it
> > using an explicit -t bi to force the byte output.
> 
> Perhaps it wasn't exactly clear in the patch. The old test case output is co=
> mmented out but there is test case output for the new patch.=20
> 
> So the test is not removed.=20

Uh, yeah, something needs to be done here still.
(There is a failing test still.)

Could we get a resubmission of the fix, please?

Thanks,
jdl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/