[PATCH 11/27] sched: Comment on rq->clock correctness in ttwu_do_wakeup() in nohz

[Frederic Weisbecker]

Just to avoid confusion.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 63b25e2..bfac40f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1302,6 +1302,12 @@ ttwu_do_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
 	if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
 		p->sched_class->task_woken(rq, p);
 
+	/*
+	 * For adaptive nohz case: We called ttwu_activate()
+	 * which just updated the rq clock. There is an
+	 * exception with p->on_rq != 0 but in this case
+	 * we are not idle and rq->idle_stamp == 0
+	 */
 	if (rq->idle_stamp) {
 		u64 delta = rq->clock - rq->idle_stamp;
 		u64 max = 2*sysctl_sched_migration_cost;
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/