Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] aerdrv: Enhanced AER logging

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:14:14PM +0000, Ortiz, Lance E wrote:
>> I removed the prefix argument because it was never used by its caller
>> and never set. The reason I added the prefix variable and set it to
>> NULL was to help in breaking up the patch and adding it would help the
>> intermittent patch build without changing too much code. I knew I was
>> actually going to use the variable in patch 3.
>
> No, the correct way to do that is to keep all changes that belong
> logically together in a single patch for ease of reviewing and avoid
> breakages. And in your case this should be pretty easy: simply move all
> the 'prefix' touching code to patch #3 and you're done, AFAICT.

Lance, you didn't add all the "prefix" stuff in AER, but since you're
touching it, I think things will make more sense if you clean it up at
the same time.  There are a lot of printk() calls there that should be
converted to dev_printk().

I think I see why it was done that way -- it sticks either
KERN_WARNING or KERN_ERR at the beginning of the prefix, then uses
plain printk() later.  I guess that means you only have to pass around
the prefix argument, rather than both a "level" and a "struct pci_dev
*".  But I think it will be simpler overall to pass both and take
advantage of dev_printk() and stop emulating it.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/