Re: [PATCH 04/26] aio: remove retry-based AIO

[Kent Overstreet]

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:04:11PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >@@ -52,15 +46,6 @@ struct kioctx;
> >  * not ask the method again -- ki_retry must ensure forward progress.
> >  * aio_complete() must be called once and only once in the future, multiple
> >  * calls may result in undefined behaviour.
> >- *
> >- * If ki_retry returns -EIOCBRETRY it has made a promise that kick_iocb()
> >- * will be called on the kiocb pointer in the future.  This may happen
> >- * through generic helpers that associate kiocb->ki_wait with a wait
> >- * queue head that ki_retry uses via current->io_wait.  It can also happen
> >- * with custom tracking and manual calls to kick_iocb(), though that is
> >- * discouraged.  In either case, kick_iocb() must be called once and only
> >- * once.  ki_retry must ensure forward progress, the AIO core will wait
> >- * indefinitely for kick_iocb() to be called.
> >  */
> > struct kiocb {
> > 	struct list_head	ki_run_list;
> 
> Then you can also erase ki_run_list if no longer used.

Thanks, fixed that and also the comments you pointed out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/