Re: [PATCH 17/25] wm97xx: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Dmitry.

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 01:54:50AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This is not 100% equivalent transformation as now we schedule first and
> disable IRQ later... Anyway, I think the driver shoudl be converted to
> threaded IRQ instead. Mark, does the patch below make any sense to you?

Yeah, I think the conversion is actually broken.  There isn't anything
which prevents work item execution racing against irq disabling.  I
agree the right thing to do is using threaded irq handler.

Thanks!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/