Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "perf: Require exclude_guest to use PEBS -kernel side enforcement"

[Jiri Olsa]

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:21:23PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 12/19/12 8:07 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >This reverts commit 20b279ddb38ca42f8863cec07b4d45ec24589f13.
> >
> >Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> As a courtesy please CC people involved in a commit on any revert request.
> 
> Arnaldo: please do not take this patch; I have proposed an
> alternative. Just waiting to hear back on its acceptability.
> 
> David

this one was not meant to be applied.. just wanted the precise
to work, so I could test other stuff.. I did mention that in:

  [RFC 0/3] perf tests: Adding precise event attribute test
  ---
  I based this on revert (Patch 1) discussed in [1]. I'm not sure
  this revert will tak place at the end, but I wanted to get some
  feedback on the 'precise' attribute first.
  ...
  [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135536724805356&w=2
  ---

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/