Re: [PATCH 07/24] nohz: Assign timekeeping duty to a non-full-nohzCPU

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Sat Dec 22 2012 - 12:05:43 EST

Next message: Larry Finger: "Regression in 3.8-rc1: "BUG: sleeping function called from invalidcontext""
Previous message: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH review 2/3] pidns: Stop pid allocation when init dies"
In reply to: Frederic Weisbecker: "Re: [PATCH 07/24] nohz: Assign timekeeping duty to a non-full-nohz CPU"
Next in thread: Frederic Weisbecker: "[PATCH 11/24] sched: Comment on rq->clock correctness in ttwu_do_wakeup() in nohz"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 17:39 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> Ah thanks! I'm folding your patch.
> I can add your SOB, right?

Sure, feel free to add my SOB on any of the changes I sent to you.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Larry Finger: "Regression in 3.8-rc1: "BUG: sleeping function called from invalidcontext""
Previous message: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH review 2/3] pidns: Stop pid allocation when init dies"
In reply to: Frederic Weisbecker: "Re: [PATCH 07/24] nohz: Assign timekeeping duty to a non-full-nohz CPU"
Next in thread: Frederic Weisbecker: "[PATCH 11/24] sched: Comment on rq->clock correctness in ttwu_do_wakeup() in nohz"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]