Re: [PATCH RFC] spidev.c: add sysfs attributes for SPI configuration

[Grant Likely]

On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:30:36 +0100, Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 15:09:25 Grant Likely wrote:
> > Not a good idea. sysfs is not a good place for operational
> > interfaces. Please use the spi character devices for direct
> > manipulation of the SPI configuration.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Can you explain why it is not a good idea? I do not understand; what 
> is the advantage of ioctl through char device? Or what it the issue 
> with sysfs?
> 
> Thank you very much

I'm cautious about adding operational interfaces to sysfs because it can
be quite difficult to get the locking right. To begin with it splits up
a single interface into multiple files, any of which can be held open by
a process. Then there is the question of ordering of operations when
there are multiple users. For instance, if there were two users, each of
which using different transfer parameters, a sysfs interface doesn't
provide any mechanism to group setting up the device with the transfer.

These are lessons learned the hard way with the gpio sysfs abi. I don't
want to get caught in the same trap for spi.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/