[PATCH 03/25] sja1000: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Dec 21 2012 - 21:03:48 EST

There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
before queueing, flushing or cancelling it. Most uses are unnecessary
and quite a few of them are buggy.

Remove unnecessary pending tests from sja1000. Only compile tested.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please let me know how this patch should be routed. I can take it
through the workqueue tree if necessary.


drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
index d84888f..600ac72 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
@@ -339,8 +339,7 @@ static void peak_pciec_set_leds(struct peak_pciec_card *card, u8 led_mask, u8 s)
static void peak_pciec_start_led_work(struct peak_pciec_card *card)
- if (!delayed_work_pending(&card->led_work))
- schedule_delayed_work(&card->led_work, HZ);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&card->led_work, HZ);


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/