Re: [PATCH 11/11] pidns: Support unsharing the pid namespace.

[Rob Landley]

On 12/21/2012 11:51:03 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Eric. I understand that it is too late to discuss this. And yes, I  
> simply
> > do not understand the problem space, I never used containers.
> >
> > But, stupid question. Let's ignore the pid_ns-specific oddities.
> >
> > 1. Ignoring setns(), why do we need /proc/pid/ns/ ?
> >
> > 2. Why setns() requires /proc/pid/ns/ ? IOW, why it can't be
> >
> > 	sys_setns(pid_t pid, int clone_flags)
> > 	{
> > 		truct task_struct *tsk = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> > 		struct nsproxy *target = get_nsproxy(tsk->nsproxy);
> >
> > 		new_nsproxy = create_new_namespaces(...);
> >
> > 		if (clone_flags & CLONE_NEWNS)
> > 			mntns_install(...);
> > 		if (clone_flags & CLONE_NEWIPC)
> > 			ipcns_install(...);
> > 		...
> > 	}
> >
> > I feel I missed something trivial, but what?
>
> It is a question of naming.
>
> The problem I set out to solve when all of this was introduced was how
> to name namespaces without introducing yet another namespace.
>
> The solution to the naming problem that I finally found was to  
> introduce
> something I could mount.

Where might I find documentation on this? I'm aware of  
Documentation/namespaces but it's only got one file in it (about  
conflicts between namespace types). I'm aware of  
http://lxc.sourceforge.net/index.php/about/kernel-namespaces/ and  
http://lxc.sourceforge.net/man/ but that's mixed in with the  
implementation details of a particular userspace tool, and tends to lag  
the kernel significantly. (Those man pages were last updated in 2010,  
which if I recall was the last time I poked them about it.)

Rob--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/