RE: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Fix the unpaired runtime_get/put cases

From: Liu, Chuansheng
Date: Thu Dec 20 2012 - 20:34:55 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 9:51 PM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: lrg@xxxxxx; perex@xxxxxxxx; tiwai@xxxxxxx; alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Fix the unpaired runtime_get/put cases
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:37:26AM +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
>
> > Meanwhile, is it useful to add one warning there for that case?
> > After all, in probing, set the bias to _STANDBY even idle_bias_off == 1, and
> calling get_runtime_sync(), it
> > will let the code more obscure. So giving a warning there to indicate the
> driver:
> > it is not suggested that in probing, set the bias to _STANDBY even
> idle_bias_off == 1.
>
> Probably, send a patch please. Like I say it is possible to start off
> in _STANDBY providing the driver grabs the runtime PM reference too but
> I can't think of any reason for doing that so the warning seems sensible.
The patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/20/506 has been sent for giving warning
in that case. Thanks your reviewing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/