Re: [PATCH] mm/sparse: don't check return value of alloc_bootmemcalls

From: David Rientjes
Date: Thu Dec 20 2012 - 15:29:59 EST


On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Sasha Levin wrote:

> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index 6b5fb76..ae64d6e 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -403,15 +403,13 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map,
> size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> map = __alloc_bootmem_node_high(NODE_DATA(nodeid), size * map_count,
> PAGE_SIZE, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
> - if (map) {
> - for (pnum = pnum_begin; pnum < pnum_end; pnum++) {
> - if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
> - continue;
> - map_map[pnum] = map;
> - map += size;
> - }
> - return;
> + for (pnum = pnum_begin; pnum < pnum_end; pnum++) {
> + if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
> + continue;
> + map_map[pnum] = map;
> + map += size;
> }
> + return;
>
> /* fallback */
> for (pnum = pnum_begin; pnum < pnum_end; pnum++) {

That's not true when slab_is_available() and why would you possibly add a
return statement right before fallback code in such cases?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/