Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat:fix incorrect function comment

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

Ravishankar N <cyberax82@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>  /*
> - * Return values: negative -> error, 0 -> not found, positive -> found,
> - * value is the total amount of slots, including the shortname entry.
> + * Return values: negative -> error/not found, 0 -> found.
>   */
>  int fat_search_long(struct inode *inode, const unsigned char *name,
>  		    int name_len, struct fat_slot_info *sinfo)
> @@ -1176,7 +1175,7 @@ static int fat_add_new_entries(struct inode *dir, void *slots, int nr_slots,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The minimum cluster size is 512bytes, and maximum entry
> -	 * size is 32*slots (672bytes).  So, iff the cluster size is
> +	 * size is 32*slots (672bytes).  So, if the cluster size is

iff is right here. iff == if and only if

> -//		fat_cache_add(inode, new_fclus, new_dclus);

I guess this still worth to keep as FIXME. This meant the following.

/*
 * FIXME: Although we can add this cache, fat_cache_add() is assuming to
 * be called after liner search with fat_cache_id.
 */

>  	} else {
>  		MSDOS_I(inode)->i_start = new_dclus;
>  		MSDOS_I(inode)->i_logstart = new_dclus;

Other parts looks fine.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/