Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc

[Luciano Coelho]

On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:32 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> 
> > Sure. It must be a clock driver. I already have similar driver (for McPDM fclk
> > clock) for twl6040.
> > Let me check linux-next, if CCF is there for OMAP I can send the 32k clock
> > driver soon (after writing it and testing it). It is going to be for 3.9 but
> > we can roll it with us I think locally to resolv issues.
> 
> Well, we still haven't got the foggiest idea what the actual problem is
> beyond that it's probably related to the 32kHz clock in some way (unless
> it was one of the other reverts that coincidentally made a difference,
> but we don't know what they were) so it's unlikely that just randomly
> implementing clock support is going to fix anything immediately here.

This is exactly what I had to revert (as I mentioned in the other email,
I had to revert the other patches otherwise compilation would break):

0e8e5c34 "regulator: twl: Remove references to 32kHz clock from DT bindings"
e76ab829 "regulator: twl: Remove references to the twl4030 regulator"
029dd3ce "regulator: twl: Remove another unused variable warning"

Let me know if you need more info.

--
Luca.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/