Re: [PATCH v2 03/44] Add CONFIG_HAVE_64BIT_ALIGNED_STRUCT fortaskstats

From: David Miller
Date: Mon Dec 17 2012 - 14:11:20 EST

From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:51:04 +0000

> On 10/12/12 12:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:22 AM, James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 08/12/12 03:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> On 12/05/2012 08:08 AM, James Hogan wrote:
>>>>> On 64 bit architectures with no efficient unaligned access, taskstats
>>>>> has to add some padding to a reply to prevent unaligned access warnings.
>>>>> However this also needs to apply to 32 bit architectures with 64 bit
>>>>> struct alignment such as metag (which has 64 bit memory accesses).
>>>> Wait... 64-bit struct alignment on structures with only 32-bit members?
>>>> That might be... interesting... in a number of places...
>>> I'll rewrite the description as it's a bit misleading. On metag 64bit
>>> struct alignment is required when it contains 64bit members, not if it
>>> only contains 32bit members. Although metag is a 32bit arch, it can do
>>> 64bit memory accesses which must be aligned.
>> The C alignment rules should take care of this automatically (struct alignment
>> is the maximum alignment of its members).
> Hi Geert,
> Please see the comment in mk_reply in kernel/taskstats.c. The structure
> is being serialised after 2 NLA headers and a pid which is why the extra
> padding needs to be added manually.

Please solve netlink attribute 64-bit alignment issues fundamentally
rather on a case-by-case basis.

We were just discussing this very issue on the netdev list recently,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at